Hope fading fast
Feb. 9th, 2009 04:27 pmThis article makes me very sad. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/us/10torture.html?hp
Yeah. Maybe it would make our country even more scorned by the rest of the world, but if even a third of that stuff is true, we deserve it.
But worse than that, I can't help but feel like the only people this really protects are the sick twisted sociopaths of the previous administration. Why are we keeping these assholes from facing their day in court?
Yeah. Maybe it would make our country even more scorned by the rest of the world, but if even a third of that stuff is true, we deserve it.
But worse than that, I can't help but feel like the only people this really protects are the sick twisted sociopaths of the previous administration. Why are we keeping these assholes from facing their day in court?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 01:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 01:17 am (UTC)So his choices are: Take a black eye with people on the left who aren't in power OR take a black eye on the right with people that can cause real problems. The amount we'd lose or gain in foreign affairs either way is likely pretty minimal. So... This early in his administration, it's tactically more sound to piss off powerless liberals than rightwing thugs.
In other words: Business as usual. I really hoped he'd have more spine. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 02:04 am (UTC)There are investigations going forward in other areas. If I were the president, I'd quietly gather data from those investigations and keep it secret until the country recovers, and only reveal it when the public can take the shock. Now's just not a good time for another Abu Ghraib.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 04:05 am (UTC)Wait, what? We have a Democratic majority in both houses.
Unless you think there are international issues involved, like, oh, I dunno, Britain being complicit in torture or something.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 04:22 am (UTC)Realistically, by the time it comes to reelection, this issue will likely be totally forgotten and we'llbe facing the lesser of two evils debate again, so it's really pretty low-risk to do something I won't approve of. ... From a shrewd tactical POV.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-10 02:01 am (UTC)This so sucks!!!
This kinda shit is the worst thing he can do. He has a lot of power right now with the people and with the economy being such shit. He has the kind public support he could really do stuff. He should rase the last administration. If they got enough eyes seeing deep horrible stuff that went on heads will roll and when heads roll Republicans will eat their own. Remember Trent "Cockfighting Redneck" Lott? They turned on him like rabid dogs. Obama needs to take what he's got and run with it.
It doesn't work to try and surf the middle. The person who did it best was Bill Clinton and they still got him and gave it to him as hard and as hypocritically they could and the middle caved to the right.
Right now as bad as things are in a way that Americans understand... their wallets.... he could do a lot and the middle would lap it up. The dems could gain back some dignity and the repugs would have to suck it.