Time to worry.
Sep. 21st, 2007 09:14 amWant to take any bets on the first use for this device?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=482560&in_page_id=1965
And remember kids. If no one can see it and it doesn't leave any marks, it's not torture, is it?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=482560&in_page_id=1965
And remember kids. If no one can see it and it doesn't leave any marks, it's not torture, is it?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-21 06:03 pm (UTC)If it can be focused on set nerve types.
Otherwise it'd be no more pleasurable than having someone bite you in the clit.
Still, maybe a combination of this ray for heat, ultrasonics for tactile, magnetic fields for mind effects..
Interesting question: Which would people be more outraged at? A pain ray or an orgasm ray? Pain's well accepted in public, but pleasure is far more personal. I suspect people at large would be more upset about the idea of a gun that incapacitated you by sudden uncontrollable orgasm. Being hurt in public is fine, but being pleasured is just embaracing..?
And would the beam work on insects and birds? I'm sure in a past article they said the ray only works on exposed skin, and birds have feathers. No idea if flys can feel pain in the same way.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-21 06:57 pm (UTC)