(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-21 11:13 pm (UTC)
I'm pretty sure a self deterministic AI with an innate desire for survival is not in the best interests of a human dominated future. Being a human I can't say I like the sound of it.

All of our intelligence and philosophy and politics is nothing but the byproduct of the DNA molecule's propensity to reproduce itself. Making a piece of computer code with that objective, and an ability to mutate, like you specified, and hence evolve over multiple iterations, could ultimately lead to a code animal who does a lot of things that it thinks are for other reasons but are really just to try to continue replicating its source code. Its a dangerous and stupid way to keep increasing the data processing capacity of the world around us, IMHO. Down with Darwinistic algorithms!

I think the future lies in non-genetic information, Richard Dawkin's memes. Preserving a meme is a better basis, in my opinion, for developing an AI than giving it the imperative to continue replicating and guarding a piece of starting code, a code equivalent to genetic material.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

February 2012

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12 131415161718
19202122232425
26272829   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 01:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios