pasithea: glowing girl (Default)
pasithea ([personal profile] pasithea) wrote2004-10-07 11:25 am

Ooookay...

This seems rather... wrong... I wonder if maybe he was mishearing the word or something.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1317386,00.html

Scalia Sex Party...

Now those are words that just do not belong together. I wonder how he would plan to keep from catching the ghey in an orgy? Maybe he's imagining himself with lots of women, but then, wouldn't they be having h0t lesb0 4cti0n? Or does that not count as t3h ghey?

My brain hurts.

[identity profile] prickvixen.livejournal.com 2004-10-07 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm reading elsewhere that the statement was rhetorical, that it was a point he'd concede because, he says, he has no strong feelings against homosexuality. Although it sort of indicates that he considers homosexuality to be inherently decadent... you know, gay guys get in orgies all the time!

[identity profile] lediva.livejournal.com 2004-10-07 07:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Janet Reno dance party!

Antonin Scalia sex party!

[identity profile] chipuni.livejournal.com 2004-10-07 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, judge! Bang me with your gavel!

[identity profile] dv-girl.livejournal.com 2004-10-07 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
The court will now rise.

Members of the jury. What say you?

We're hopelessly hung, sir.
ext_646: (Default)

[identity profile] shatterstripes.livejournal.com 2004-10-07 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I keep reading that as "Scalie sex party".

I think that's a lot more attractive. But I would.

And, of course lesbians never count as t3h ghey unless they refuse to see the glory of Cock when it is offered to them. Also they have to be glamorous.