Ooookay...
This seems rather... wrong... I wonder if maybe he was mishearing the word or something.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1317386,00.html
Scalia Sex Party...
Now those are words that just do not belong together. I wonder how he would plan to keep from catching the ghey in an orgy? Maybe he's imagining himself with lots of women, but then, wouldn't they be having h0t lesb0 4cti0n? Or does that not count as t3h ghey?
My brain hurts.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1317386,00.html
Scalia Sex Party...
Now those are words that just do not belong together. I wonder how he would plan to keep from catching the ghey in an orgy? Maybe he's imagining himself with lots of women, but then, wouldn't they be having h0t lesb0 4cti0n? Or does that not count as t3h ghey?
My brain hurts.
no subject
no subject
Antonin Scalia sex party!
no subject
no subject
Members of the jury. What say you?
We're hopelessly hung, sir.
no subject
I think that's a lot more attractive. But I would.
And, of course lesbians never count as t3h ghey unless they refuse to see the glory of Cock when it is offered to them. Also they have to be glamorous.